PEER REVIEW PROCESS

Jurnal Intensi uses a double-blind peer-review process to ensure quality, objectivity, and academic integrity, with author and reviewer identities concealed throughout the review.

Review Procedure
1. Initial Screening
The editorial team assesses submissions for scope, guidelines, ethics, and plagiarism compliance. Non-compliant manuscripts may be rejected without external review.

2. Assignment to Reviewers
Eligible manuscripts are reviewed by at least two independent experts selected based on expertise and absence of conflicts of interest.

3. Peer Review Stage
Reviewers evaluate originality, contribution, methodology, clarity, ethics, and relevance, and provide constructive feedback.

4. Editorial Decision
Decisions include Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject, and are communicated with anonymized reviewer comments via OJS.

5. Revision and Re-evaluation
Authors submit revised manuscripts with a point-by-point response; major revisions may undergo re-review.

6. Final Decision and Publication
The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision. Accepted manuscripts proceed to editing and publication.

Review Timeline
The average review process takes 4–8 weeks, depending on reviewer availability and revision complexity.