Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Indonesian version of the social entrepreneurial antecedents scale in college student
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26486/psikologi.v26i1.3552Keywords:
Scale adaptation, social entrepreneurship, sociopreneur, studentsAbstract
The concept of social entrepreneurship has gained popularity in Indonesia. However, there has been a lack of development in measuring individuals' readiness or interest in social entrepreneurship within the Indonesian context. Based on a literature review, there are no existing studies that have translated and adapted instruments to measure the antecedents of social entrepreneurship for students. One such instrument, the Social Entrepreneurial Antecedents Scale (SEAS), was originally developed to assess social entrepreneurial intentions. This study aims to adapt the scale, especially for students in tertiary institutions for 131 students. Following Beaton's theoretical framework, the research was conducted in six stages: translation, synthesis, back translation, expert committee review, pre-testing, and assessment. The construct validity of the adapted scale was analyzed through confirmatory factor analysis using JAMOVI, focusing on four aspects of social entrepreneurship: empathy, moral obligation, self-efficacy, and social support. The adapted scale, which consists of 14 items, has a reliability coefficient of 0.835. Item discrimination for these 14 items ranged from 0.207 to 0.684. Based on the adaptation process results, this sociopreneurship scale is valid for measuring social entrepreneurial intentions and evaluating the effectiveness of interventions aimed at fostering such intentions.
Keyword: Scale adaptation; social entrepreneurship; sociopreneur; students.
References
Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). IBM SPSS Amos 22 user’s guide. In Amos Development Corporation.
Azwar, S. (2016). Reliabilitas dan validitas aitem. Buletin Psikologi, 3(1), 19–26.
Barreto, M., & Doyle, D. M. (2022). Benevolent and hostile sexism in a shifting global context. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(2), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00136-x
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191.
Bornstein, D. (2004). How to change the world: Social entrepreneurship and the power of new ideas. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership. Retrieved November 10, 2022, from http://www.fntc.info/files/documents/The%20meaning%20of%20Social% 20Entreneurship
Dees, J. G. (2012). A tale of two cultures: Charity, problem solving, and the future of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics. 111(3): 321–334.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. (2000). Introducing LISREL. London: SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209359
DuBay, M., & Watson, L. R. (2019). Translation and cultural adaptation of parent-report developmental assessments: Improving rigor in methodology. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 62, 55–65.
Gallup, G. G., & Platek, S. M. (2002). Cognitive empathy presupposes self‐awareness: Evidence from phylogeny, ontogeny, neuropsychology, and mental illness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1): 36–37.
Groch, K., Gerdes, K. E., Segal, E. A., & Groch, M. (2012). The grassroots londolozi model of african development: Social empathy in action. Journal of Community Practice, 20(1‐2): 154–177.
Hair-Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. 7th Edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 761.
Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence Based Nursing, 18(3), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129
Hockerts, K. (2017). Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 105–130.
Li, X., Abbas, J., Dongling, W., Baig, N. U. A., & Zhang, R. (2022). From cultural tourism to social entrepreneurship: Role of social value creation for environmental sustainability. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925768
Mair, J., & Noboa, E. (2006). Social Entrepreneurship: How intentions to create a social venture are formed. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Macaskill, A., Maltby, J., & Day, L. (2002). Forgiveness of self and others and emotional empathy. The Journal of social psychology, 142(5): 663–665.
Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring : 29–39.
Miah, M. T., Lakner, Z., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2024). Addressing poverty through social entrepreneurship for sustainable development: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Administrative Sciences, 14(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14010016
Mohamad, M. M., Sulaiman, N. L., Sern, L. C., & Salleh, K. M. (2015). Measuring the validity and reliability of research instruments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129
Nakao, K., & Nishide, Y. (2020). The development of social entrepreneurship education in Japan. Entrepreneurship Education, 3, 95–117.
Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56–65.
Prazkier, R., & Nowak, A. (2012). Social entrepreneur: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Rahman, A., Iqbal, Z., Waheed, W., & Hussain, N. (2003). Translation and cultural adaptation of health questionnaires. JPMA: Journal of The Pakistan Medical Association, 53(4), 142–147.
Sampaio, C., & Sebastião, J. R. (2024). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: Uncovering themes, trends, and discourse. Administrative Sciences, 14(3), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14030053
Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: A clear and user‐friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Sylvia, S. (2022). sociopreneurship to reduce extreme poverty in the coastal areas of Pangkajene Islands: A literatur review. Entrepreneurship and Small Business Research.
Tran, A. T. P., & Von-Korflesch, H. (2016). A conceptual model of social entrepreneurial intention based on the social cognitive career theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 17–38.
Wuryandari, N. E. R., Parashakti, R. D., & Lubis, M. (2020). Sociopreneur intention: Unlock the potential of Indonesian vanilla farmers. In 4th International Conference on Management, Economics and Business (ICMEB 2019) (pp. 196-199). Atlantis Press.
Zamboni, K., Schellenberg, J., Hanson, C., Betran, A. P., & Dumont, A. (2019). Assessing scalability of an intervention: Why, how and who? Health Policy and Planning, 34(7), 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czz068
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 InSight: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with INSIGHT: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the Insight right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Insight. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Insight.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).