A ANALISIS KINERJA BANK METODE RGEC PT. BPR BANK BOYOLALI (PERSERODA) Periode Tahun 2021 – 2023

Authors

  • Dhiana Ekowati Universitas Nusa Megarkencana
  • Defita Mawar Sari Universitas Nusa Megarkencana, Jl. AM. Sangaji No. 49-51 Yogyakarta, 55233, Indonesia
  • Luluk Kholisoh Universitas Nusa Megarkencana, Jl. AM. Sangaji No. 49-51 Yogyakarta, 55233, Indonesia
  • Eliya Isfaatun Universitas Nusa Megarkencana, Jl. AM. Sangaji No. 49-51 Yogyakarta, 55233, Indonesia
  • Maria Magdalena PD Universitas Nusa Megarkencana, Jl. AM. Sangaji No. 49-51 Yogyakarta, 55233, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26486/akun.v10i1.4425

Abstract

A bank is a financial intermediary institution, generally established with the authority to accept money deposits, lend money, and issue promissory notes or known as banknotes. Financial performance is one of the important indicators to determine the financial condition of the bank. The better the financial performance, the better or healthier the health level of the bank. (Sukarno, 2011: 2). This study aims to analyze banking health performance using the RGEC method. The financial ratios used in this study are LDR, CGC, ROA, BOPO, and CAR.

The research object in this study is the financial performance report of PT BPR Bank Boyolali using the RGEC method for the final quarter period of 2021 - 2023. This type of research is descriptive quantitative, a research method that utilizes quantitative data and is described descriptively. This study uses secondary data in the form of financial information obtained from financial reports published through the Financial Services Authority (OJK) website.

The results of this study indicate a decrease in the LDR ratio from 98% in 2021 to 79.9% in 2023, reflecting a more balanced management of loans and deposits. The implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) principles remains good with high regulatory compliance. Profitability remains solid with a stable ROA at 2.5% in 2021 and 2022, albeit slightly declining to 2.3% in 2023, and an efficient BOPO ratio of 79.9% in 2021.

References

Adnanti, W. A., Indarti, I., & Aditya, E. M. (2022). Analisis Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum BUMN Menggunakan Metode RGEC. ECONBANK: Journal of Economics and Banking, 4(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.35829/econbank.v4i1.167

Aini, R. N., & Surya Pratikto, M. I. (2021). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan Syariah Melalui Metode RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital) Tahun 2015-2019 (Studi pada PT Bank Syariah Bukopin (Persero) Tbk). PROFIT: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 5(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.33650/profit.v5i1.1998

Anam, H., SL, H., & Anhar, B. (2022). Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Metode Rgec. Jurnal GeoEkonomi, 13(1), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.36277/geoekonomi.v13i1.150

Azizah, R. A. N., & Adelina Citradewi. (2023). Metode RGEC untuk Menilai Tingkat Kesehatan Bank pada PT Bank Aladin Syariah Tbk. Velocity: Journal of Sharia Finance and Banking, 3(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.28918/velocity.v3i2.1019

Dayyesi, H., Rafidah, R., & Siregar, E. S. (2023). Analisis Penilaian Kesehatan Bank Dengan Menggunakan Metode RGEC (Risk, Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning, Capital) Pada Bank Umum Syariah Tahun 2017-2021. Al-Intaj : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 9(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.29300/aij.v9i1.7988

Dewi, M. (2018). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Rgec (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital) (Studi Pada Pt. Bank Rakyat Indonesia, Tbk Periode 2013-2017). Niagawan, 7(3), 67. https://doi.org/10.24114/niaga.v7i3.11602

Dinita Mayangsari, & Ersi Sisdianto. (2024). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Terhadap Kinerja Bank Dengan Metode RGEC. Jurnal Pajak Dan Analisis Ekonomi Syariah, 1(3), 01–19. https://doi.org/10.61132/jpaes.v1i3.165

Iqbal Surya Pratikto, M., Qanita, A., & Ulfa Maghfiroh, R. (2020). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan dan Potensi Financial Distress dengan Metode RGEC Pada BNI Syariah Tahun 2014-2018. El-Qist: Journal of Islamic Economics and Business (JIEB), 9(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.15642/elqist.2019.9.1.87-101

Juwita, R. (2024). Analisis Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning, Capital (RGEC) PT Bank Tabungan Negara Tbk. EKOMA : Jurnal Ekonomi, 3(4), 48–60. https://btn.co.id/report

Keuangan, L., & Bank, K. (2024). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan PT China Construction Bank Tbk : Pendekatan Model RGEC. 18(1), 67–78.

Mabel Rahma, T. A., Sulistiyo, H., & Suhartini, S. (2023). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan Pada PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero), Tbk Tahun 2019-2021 Menggunakan Metode Rgec. Akuntoteknologi, 15(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.31253/aktek.v15i1.1885

Maulida, F., Ramli, & Finanto, H. (2020). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Menggunakan Metode RGEC (Risk Profile,Good Corporate Governance,Earning,Dan Capital) Pada Bank Umum Swasta Syariah Periode 2018-2021. Jurnal Tugas Akhir Mahasiswa Akuntansi (JMAP), 1–8.

Moh. Abd. Rahman. (2022). Metode Rgec Menjadi Tolak Ukur Tingkat Kesehatan Bank. Ar-Ribhu : Jurnal Manajemen Dan Keuangan Syariah, 3(1), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.55210/arribhu.v3i1.812

Muhlisa, Dipoatmodjo, tenri S. P., & Nurman. (2023). Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Menggunakan Metode RGEC Pada PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk Periode 2017-2021. Jurnal Ekonomi STIEP, 7(1), 1–9.

Pattipeilohy, G. E., Ferdinandus, S. J., & Christianty, R. (2023). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan Menggunakan Metode RGEC Pada PT. Bank Central Asia Tbk Tahun 2017-2022. Manis: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 7(1), 17–34.

Pratikno, M. I. S., Febrianti, F., & ... (2023). Analisis tingkat kesehatan bank pada pt. bank permata tbk dengan menggunakan metode rgec (risk profile, good corporate governance, earning and capital). Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi …, 6(1), 72–93. https://journal.feb.unmul.ac.id/index.php/JIAM/article/view/5811

Raihan, M. F., & Ramadhan, Z. (2023). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Menggunakan Metode RGEC Pada Bank Pembangunan Daerah. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis Digital, 2(1), 49–64.

Rodiyah, S. (2019). Analisis Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Menggunakan Metode Rgec (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital) Pada Bank Umum Syariah Di Indonesia Periode 2014–2016. Accounting and Management Journal, 2(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.33086/amj.v2i2.890

Saputra, R., Soleh, A., & Febliansa, M. R. (2024). Analysis Of Bank Health Level With RGEC Method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, And Capital) On PT. Bank Bengkulu. Jurnal Akuntansi, Manajemen Dan Bisnis Digital, 3(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.37676/jambd.v3i2.5927

Sarra, H. D., Mikrad, M., & Sunanto, S. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Menggunakan Metode Rgec Terhadap Profitabilitas Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Periode 2015-2019. Dynamic Management Journal, 6(2), 110. https://doi.org/10.31000/dmj.v6i2.6763

Sharon Megawati Senduk Frendy O Pelleng Dantje Keles Program Studi Administrasi Bisnis, R. A., & Ilmu Administrasi, J. (2021). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Menggunakan Metode RGEC pada PT. Bank SulutGo Manado. Productivity, 2(6), 2021.

Zega, E., Hamzah, Z. Z., & Rosyadi, I. (2022). Analisis Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan PT Bank Buko[in TBK Dengan Metode REGC Periode 2015-2019. Jurismata, 4(1), 25–35.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-30

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1: Mei 2024

Section

Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Mercu Buana (JRAMB)

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Dhiana Ekowati, Defita Mawar Sari, Luluk Kholisoh, Eliya Isfaatun, Maria Magdalena PD

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with (JRAMB) Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Mercu Buana agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the JRAMB right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in JRAMB. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JRAMB.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Â