A semantic study on figurative languages used in thailand advertisements

Authors

  • Santa Maya Pramusita Sanata Dharma University
  • Daiya Putri Sanata Dharma University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26486/jele.v4i2.436

Keywords:

linguistics, semantic, figurative languages, Thailand advertisements, hyperbole

Abstract

Advertisement is one of communication tools used to promote products, influence people to do something, and plant certain ideologies. In achieving these goals, the use of figurative language is deeply needed due to its effectiveness in creating enchanting campaigns. In this paper, a semantic study is done to analyze the figurative languages and its contextual meanings in four Thailand advertisements, with the hope that it can give an explanation of how messages delievered through the advertisements. As for the advertisements that the writers use are Smooth E. Baby Face Foam, Smooth E. Face Scrub Advertisement Series, Peppermint Field Inhaler, as well as Nature Gift 21, and Coffee Plus Advertisement that have interesting plots and many figurative languages. The result of this study shows that hyperbole and simile are the most figurative languages found in those advertisements, which is used to insert some humors and attract audiences’ attention to buy the products.

Author Biographies

Santa Maya Pramusita, Sanata Dharma University

I am studying at magister of english language studies, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta

Daiya Putri, Sanata Dharma University

I am studying at magister of english language studies, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta

References

Agnes, A. (2009). The Use of Metaphor in Advertising. Argumentum, 5, pp. 18-24.

Bodla, S.S. 2006. Communication and Its Significance. Retrieved December 8th, 2017 from http://www.ddegjust.ac.in/studymaterial/bba/bba-206.pdf

Burger, et al. (2015). Making ads less complex, yet more creative and persuasive: the effects of conventional metaphors and irony in print advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 34 (3), pp. 515532

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design; Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mix Methods Approaches. California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Jobst, Katie. 2011. The Culture of Advertising in Thailand. Retrieved December 5th 2017 from https://maytermthailand.org/2011/05/01/the-culture-of-advertising-in-thailand/.

Joseph. Chris. 2010. Example of Metaphor in Advertising.Retrieved December 25th 2017 from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/examples-metaphors-advertising-10422.html

Kleitsch, Oana. 2015. Use of Hyperboles in Advertising Effectiveness: International Conference RCIC’15 Redefining Community in Intercultural Context. Retrieved from afach.ro

Mehrotra, A. (n.d). Effect of Personification in Humor Advertising. River of Knowledge: A knowedge of Powerhouse. Retrieved from https://www.river-of-knowledge.com/effect-personification-humor-advertising/

Nordquist, R. 2015. The top 20 figure of speech. Retrieved December 8th, 2017 from https://www.thoughtco.com/top-figures-of-speech-1691818

Punyapiroje, C., Morrison, M., & Hoy, M. (2002). A Nation Under the Influence: The Creative Strategy Process for Advertising in Thailand. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 24(2), 51. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

Svaziene, L. (2010). The Persuasive Effect of Metaphor in Advertising. Retrieved from http://www.su.lt/bylos/mokslo_leidiniai/jmd/10_01_27/svaziene.pdf

Yuan, X. (2014). Study on Symbol Characteristics of Advertisement Design. International Conference on Education Technology and Social Science. Retrieved from atlantis-press.com

Published

2018-12-31

Issue

Section

(JELE) Journal Of English Language and Education