PERUBAHAN IKLIM, SIAPA YANG BERTANGGUNG JAWAB?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26486/psikologi.v21i2.811Keywords:
perubahan iklim, atribusi tanggung jawab, perilaku pro lingkunganAbstract
Tujuan dalam studi pendahuluan ini untuk melihat keyakinan serta atribusi individu dalam melihat tanggung jawab terkait permasalahan perubahan iklim dengan responden mahasiswa. Pengumpulan data menggunakan pertanyaan terbuka dengan melibatkan 267 responden. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan menggunakan pendekatan analisis konten. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 77% responden merasa familiar terkait dengan fenomena perubahan iklim dan 72% mahasiswa yang meyakini bahwa saat ini sedang mengalami permasalahan perubahan iklim yang dipersepsikan dengan 2 indikator terbesar yaitu suhu yang terasa meningkat dan kondisi cuaca saat ini yang tidak menentu. Selain itu, atribusi tanggung jawab permasalahan mengenai perubahan iklim menurut mayoritas para responden (98%) diarahkan pada perilaku individu dibandingkan kententuan takdir. Sehingga menurut para responden, upaya menyelesaikan permasalahan perubahan iklim ini adalah perubahan gaya hidup keseharian yang pro terhadap lingkunganReferences
Brenkert-Smith, H., Meldrum, J. R., & Champ, P. A. Climate change beliefs and hazard mitigation behaviors: homeowners and wildfire risk. Environmental Hazards, 14 (4), 341-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2015.1080656.
Clayton, S., Devine-Wright, P., Stern, P., S., Whitmarsh, P., Carrico, A., Steg, L., Swim, J., & Bonnes, M. (2015). Psychological research and global climate change. Nature Climate Change, 5, 640-646. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2622.
Corlett, R. T. (2014). The impacts of climate change in the Tropics. Diakses dari https://www.jcu.edu.au/state-of-the-tropics/publications/2014/2014-essay-pdfs/Essay-2-Corlett.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches 3rd ed. California: Sage Publications.
Ditjenppi Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2016). Perubahan iklim, perjanjian paris dan nationally determined contribution. Jakarta: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan.
____________________________________________________. (2017). Dampak dan fenomena perubahan iklim. Diakses dari http://ditjenppi.menlhk.go.id/kcpi/index.php/info-iklim/dampak-fenomena-perubahan-iklim/229-perubahan-iklim-di-indonesia#.
____________________________________________________. (2018). Telah terbit pedoman penyusunan aksi adaptasi perubahan iklim. Diakses dari http://ditjenppi.menlhk.go.id/index.php/berita-ppi/2714-telah-terbit-pedoman-penyusunan-aksi-adaptasi-perubahan-iklim#.
Elo, S. & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62 (1), 107-115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
Gifford, R., Kormos, C., & McIntyre, A. (2011). Behavioral dimensions of climate change: drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions. Climate Change, 2 (6), 801-827. doi: 10.1002/wcc.143.
Haryanto, H. C., & Prahara, S. A. P. (2017). Yakinkah dengan adanya perubahan iklim?. INQUIRY: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 8 (2), 88-99.
Heat, Y., & Gifford, R. (2006). Free-market ideology and environmental degradation: The Case of Belief in Global Climate Change. Environment and Behavior, 38 (1), 48-71. doi: 10.1177/0013916505277998.
Hsieh, H-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15 (9), 1277-1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
Jang, S. M. (2013). Framing responsibility in climate change discourse: Ethnocentric attribution bias, perceived causes, and policy attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.003.
Karp, D., G. (1996). Values and their effect on pro environmental behavior. Environment And Behavior, 28 (1), 111-133. doi: 10.1177/0013916596281006.
Koger, S. M., Leslie, K. E., & Hayes, E. D. (2011). Climate change: Psychological solutions and strategies for change. Ecopsychology, 3 (4), 227-235. DOI: 10.1089/eco.2011.0041.
Larson, L., R., Stedman, R., C., Cooper, C., B., & Decker, D., J. (2015). Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 112-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.004.
Milfont, T., L., Milojev, P., Greaves, L., M., Sibley, C., G. (2015). Socio-cultural and psychological foundations of climate change beliefs. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 44 (1), 17-30.
PPID Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2018). Tiga tahun capaian pengendalian perubahan iklim. Diakses dari http://ppid.menlhk.go.id/berita_foto/browse/975.
Reja, U., Manfreda, K. L., Hlebec, V., & Vehovar, V. (2003). Open-ended vs Close-ended Question in Web Questionnaires. Advances in Methodology and Statistics, 19, 159-177.
Swim, J., Clayton, S., & Doherty, T. (2011). Psychology and global climate change: Addressing a multi faceted phenomenon and set of challenges. Diakses dari https://www.apa.org/science/about/publications/climate-change.pdf.
The Brown International Advanced Research Institute. (2014). An international survey initiative on “students, consumption, and environmentâ€. Diakses dari http://watson.brown.edu/biari/files/biari/imce/BIARI%20Survey%20Project%20Narrative%20Report-Final-06172014.pdf
Weber, E. U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of climate change?. Climate Change, 1 (3), 332-342. doi: 10.1002/wcc.41.
Williamson, K., Satre-Meloy, A., Velasco, K., & Green, K. (2018). Climate change needs behavior change: Making the case for behavioral solutions to reduce global warming. Arlington, VA: Rare
Wolff, E., Fung, I., Hoskins, B., Mitchell, J., Palmer, T., Santer, B., Shepherd, J., Shine, K., Solomon, S., Trenberth, K., Walsh, J., & Wuebbles, D. (2014). Climate change: Evidence and Causes. Diakses dari http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/exec-office-other/climate-change-full.pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with INSIGHT: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the Insight right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Insight. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Insight.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
