CIRI-CIRI KEPRIBADIAN DAN KEPATUTAN SOSIAL SEBAGAI PREDIKTOR SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING (KESEJAHTERAAN SUBYEKTIF) PADA REMAJA AKHIR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26486/psikologi.v17i2.693Keywords:
Ciri-ciri kepribadian Big Five Personality, kepatutan sosial Marlowe Crowne, subjective well- beingAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara ciri-ciri kepribadian, kepatutan sosial dengan subjective well-being pada remaja akhir. Sampel penelitian berjumlah 186 remaja laki-laki dan perempuan, usia 18-21 tahun, telah menyelesaikan serangkaian skala subjective well-being, skala ciri-ciri kepribadian Big Five Personality dan skala kepatutan sosial Marlowe Crowne. Analisis regresi berganda digunakan untuk menguji hubungan antara ciri-ciri kepribadian dan kepatutan sosial dengan subjective well-being pada remaja akhir (hipotesis pertama). Analisis korelasi Parsial digunakan untuk menguji hubungan antara ciri-ciri kepribadian dengan subjective well-being pada remaja akhir (hipotesis kedua), dan hubungan antara kepatutan sosial dengan subjective well-being pada remaja akhir (hipotersis ketiga). Hasil analisis data menunjukkan: (1) ada hubungan kuat antara ciri-ciri kepribadian dan kepatutan sosial dengan subjective well-being, dengan koefisien regresi antara ciri-ciri kepribadian dan kepatutan sosial dengan subjective well-being (kepuasan hidup Rxy = 0,449, afek positif Rxy = 0,337, dan afek negatif Rxy = 0,720) dengan nilai p < 0,01. Hasil analisis varian regresi (kepuasan hidup F = 7,549, afek positif F = 3,828, dan afek negatif F = 32,072) dengan nilai p < 0,01. Prediksi ciri-ciri kepribadian dan kepatutan sosial dengan subjective well-being pada remaja akhir antara 11,4% hingga 51,8%. (2) ada hubungan antara ciri-ciri kepribadian dengan subjective well-being, koefisien korelasi antara ciri-ciri kepribadian dan subjective well-being (kepuasan hidup rxy = 0,018-0,207; afek positif rxy = 0,011-0,244; dan afek negatif rxy = 0,195-0,438) dengan nilai p < 0,05. (3) Ada hubungan antara kepatutan sosial dengan subjective well-being, koefisien korelasi antara kepatutan sosial dan subjective well-being (kepuasan hidup rxy = 0,166; afek positif rxy = 0,175; dan afek negatif rxy = -0,143) dengan nilai p < 0,05. Kesimpulan: ciri-ciri kepribadian (Big Five Personalty) dan kepatutan sosial (Marlowe Crowne) dapat dijadikan prediktor subjective well-being pada remaja akhir.References
Brajša-Žganec, A., Ivanovic, D., & Lipovcan, L.K.( 2011). Personality Traits and Social Desirability as Predictors of Subjective Well-Being. Psihologijske Teme, 20(2), 261-276.
Chan, R., & Joseph, S. (2000). Dimen-sions of personality, domains of aspiration, and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 347-354.
Compton, W.C. (2005). Introduction to Positive Psychology. New York: Thomson Wadsworth.
Cuellar, R. (2005). The Validation of the anger implicit association test. Disser-tation. Texas: A & M University.
DeNeve, K.M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197-229.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national indeks. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34-43.
Diener, E., Suh, E.M., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24(1), 25-41.
Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E., & Smith, H.L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276-302.
Fujita, F. (1991). An investigation of the relation between extraversion, neuroticism, positiveaffect, and negative affect. MS thesis. Univ.Ill., Urbana-Champaign.
Goldberg, L.R., Johnson, J.A., Eber, H.W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M.C., Cloninger, C.R., & Gough, H.G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96.
Gordon, R. (1987). Social desirability bias: a demonstration and technique for its reduction. Journal Teaching of Psychology, 14(1),
Gutiérrez, J.L.G., Jiménez, B.M., Hernández, E.G. & Puente, C.P. (2005). Personality and subjective well-being: big five correlates and demographic variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 7(38), 1561-1569.
Judd, M. (2009). Religious orientation, context effects, and socially desirable responding. Thesis. Marietta College.
Klesges, L., Baranowski, T., Beech, B., Cullen, K., Murray, D., Rochon, J., & Pratt, C. (2004). Social desirability bias in self-reported dietary, physical activity and weight concerns measures in 8- to 10-year-old African-American girls: results from the Girls health Enrichment Multisite Studies (GEMS). Preventive Medicine, 38, 78-87.
Larsen, R.J. & Buss, D.M. (2002). Personality psychology: domain of knowledge about human nature. New York: McGraw Hill.
Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic pnenomenon. Psychol. Sci. 7, 186-89.
Maulita, E.S. (2012). Pengaruh pola asuh autoritatif dan konsep diri terhadap subjective well-being pada remaja. Tesis (tidak dipublikasikan). Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
Myers, D.G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6(1), 10-19.
Paulhus, D.L., & Reid, D.B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 307-317.
Pervin, L.A., & John, O.P. (2001). Personality; theory and reasearch. 8ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Richman, W.L., Weisband, S., Kiesler, S., & Drasgow, F. (1999). A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84,754-775.
Rusting, C.L., & Larsen, R.J. (1998). Extraversion, neuroticism, and susceptibility to positiveand negative affect: a test of two theoreticalmodels. Personal. Individ. Differ, 22, 607–12.
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52,141-166.
Salami, S.O. (2010). Emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, psuchological well-being and student’s attitudes: implications for quality education. European Journal of Educational Studies, 2(3), 247-257.
Santrock, John W. (2002), Live – Span Developmen, Alih Bahasa: Achmad Chusairi, Perkembangan Masa Hidup, Edisi Ke 5, Jilid 1-2, Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Schmutte, P.S., & Ryff, D.C. (1997). Personality and well-being: what is the connection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 549-559.
Setiono., & Lili H. (2002). Beberapa Permasalahan Remaja, dalam http://www.e-psikologi.com.
Suldo, S.M. (2009). Parent-child relationship. In R. Gilman, E.S., Huebner, dan M.J. Furlong. Handbook of Positive Psychology in School. Taylor dan Francis Routledge, New York, p. 245-256.
Trzcinski, E., & Holst, E. (2008). Subjective well-being among young people in transition to adulthood. Social Indicators Research, 87(1), 83-109.
Widhiarso, W. (2011). Evaluasi properti psikometris skala kepatutan sosial adaptasi dari Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Insani, 13(03), 138-148.
Widhiarso, W. (2012). Mendeteksi respon error pada skala psikologi melalui respons kepatutan sosial. Jurnal Penelitian, Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta, p. 1-13.
Widhiarso, W., & Suhapti, R. (2007). Eksplorasi karakteristik aitem skala psikologis yang rentan terhadap tipuan respon. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Widuri, E.L. (2010). Kepribadian big five dan strategi regulasi emosi ibu anak ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder). Humanitas, 7(2), 123-137.
Willis, Sofyan S. (2005). Remaja dan masalahnya mengupas berbagai bentuk kenakalan remaja seperti narkoba, freesex dan pemecahannya. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Zickar, M.J, Gibby, R.E., & Robie, C. (2004). Uncovering faking samples in applicant, incumbent, and experimental data sets: an application of mixed-model item response theory. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 168-190.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with INSIGHT: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the Insight right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Insight. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Insight.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
