Corrective Feedbacks and Their Implications on Learners’ Uptakes in Academic Speaking Class

Didik Hartono

Abstract


This study attempts to investigate a study on corrective feedbacks and learners’ uptakes in adult EFL classroom. The study was aimed at finding the types of corrective feedbacks were used by the academic speaking lecturer, the types of oral feedbacks were the most effective in the lecturer’s opinion, the types of uptakes followed lecturer’s corrective feedbacks, and the  types of oral corrective feedbacks were mostly preferred by the students. The study employed a qualitative research design through a passive-participatory observation of patterns of error treatment in an adult EFL class. The research subjects were the lecturer and twenty seven students of the Academic Speaking Class, the English Department of Faculty of Culture Studies, Brawijaya University, Malang. The findings show that the lecturer applied explicit correction mostly (90%), compared to another five types of corrective feedbacks. Moreover, the lecturer said that explicit correction was the most effective type of corrective feedbacks. Meanwhile, the findings also show that most student applied repetition type of uptake. On the other hand, most of the students answered that their preference of corrective feedback type was repetition corrective feedback.


Keywords


corrective feedbacks; categories of errors; explicit correction; students’ uptakes; repetition

References


Bogdan, R.G., & Biklen, S.K. 1998. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction Theory and Method. Boston: Ally and Bacon Press.

Brown, H. D. 1993. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs: San Francisco. Prentice-Hall Press.

Brown, H. D. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. San Francisco. Longman Press.

Chaudron, C. 1988. Second Language Classrooms. Research on Teaching and Learning. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Dulay H., Burt M., and Krashen S. 1982. Language Two. New York. Oxford. Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford. Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. 1997. Second Language Acquisition. Oxford. Oxford University Press.

Hasyim, A. 2002. Error Analysis in the Teaching of English. Journal of Kata. 2002, Volume 4 (1).

James, C. 1998. Errors in Language Learning and Use. Exploring Error Analysis. New York. Addison Wesley Longman Press.

Lyster, R., and Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Lyster, R. 1998a. Negotiation of Form, Recasts, and Explicit Correction in Relation to Error Types and Learner Repair in Immersion Classrooms. Cambridge. McGill University

Suzuki, M. 2010. Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake in Adult ESL Classrooms. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics Journal. 2010. Volume 4(2)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26486/jele.v4i1.440

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 47 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright of  JELE (Journal of English Language and Education), ISSN 2541-6421 (online)ISSN 2460-7142 (print) Gedung LPPM Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta

Kampus I  : Jl. Wates Km. 10 Yogyakarta 55753. Telp: 0274-6498212, 6498211, Fax. 0274-6498213 

Email: jele@mercubuana-yogya.ac.id

tumblr counter
Jele View My Stats

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.