George Orwell’s 1984 in Louis Althusser’s Perspective

Authors

  • Yudhanita Pertiwi Sekolah Tinggi Maritim Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26486/jele.v7i1.1741

Keywords:

ideology, interpellation, Ideological State Apparatus (ISA), Repressive State Apparatus (RSA), novel1984

Abstract

This research elaborates how ideology operates in a state that applies totalitarian system according to a novel entitled 1984 by George Orwell.

This research employs Althusser’s theory which identifies how an ideology places human beings as autonomous subjects in a connecting structure with relations inside it. At the beginning, human beings have been prepared to function in the structure. Moreover, Althusser has some concepts related to the state power, namely Ideological State Apparatus (ISA), Repressive State Apparatus (RSA) and resistance. The function of the state power lies on the state existence and its apparatuses. ISA and RSA are applied as a mechanism to establish the people subservience as a source of power production.

The result of this study demonstrates that there is always response from the people in a totalitarian state which applies a tight control over the people by its ideological and repressive apparatuses. As a result, this response becomes an alternative ideology; in this study is socialism, which develops as a resistance towards totalitarianism. The socialists are the proletarians who insist on the equality in the law and economy. However, the state does not allow the movement of the socialist because it is considered as a threat to the state power. Consequently, the state quickly annihilates the socialists and their ideology.

References

Althusser, Louis. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Aakar Books, 2006.

Arendt, Hannah. “The Origins of Totalitarianism [1951].†New York, 1973.

Bernstein, Gerald S. “The Architecture of Repression: The Built Environment of George Orwell’s 1984.†Journal of Architectural Education, 1985, doi:10.1080/10464883.1985.10758358.

Bloom, Harold. “Bloom’s Guide: George Orwell’s 1984.†Nueva York: Chelsea House, 2004.

Booker, M. Keith. The Dystopian Impulse in Modern Literature: Fiction as Social Criticism. Greenwood Press Westport, CT, 1994.

Donnelly, Mark. Britain in the Second World War. Routledge, 1999.

Faruk, H. T. “Pengantar Sosiologi Sastra.†Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1994.

Gleason, Abbott, et al. “On Nineteen Eighty-Four: Orwell and Our Future.†On Nineteen Eighty-Four: Orwell and Our Future, 2010.

Hole, Roar. Nineteen Eighty-Four´ s Dystopian Vision: Power and the Individual. Høgskolen i Agder, 2007.

Orwell, George. “Animal Farm ; 1984.†The Collected Stories of the World’s Greatest Writers, 1978.

Purkar, Namrata. “Dystopian Writing as a Part of Science Fiction.†The Criterion, vol. 4, no. 5, 2013, pp. 1–4.

Quinn, Edward. Critical Companion to George Orwell. Infobase Publishing, 2014.

Takwin, Bagus. Akar-Akar Ideologi: Pengantar Kajian Konsep Ideologi Dari Plato Hingga Bourdieu. Jalasutra, 2003.

Tyner, James A. “Self and Space, Resistance and Discipline: A Foucauldian Reading of George Orwell’s 1984.†Social and Cultural Geography, 2004, doi:10.1080/1464936032000137966.

Yeo, Michael. “Propaganda and Surveillance in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four: Two Sides of the Same Coin.†Global Media Journal, 2010.

Published

2021-06-30

Issue

Section

(JELE) Journal Of English Language and Education