PERAN INTERAKSI SOSIAL DAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MEMAHAMI KONSEP PADA MATERI OPTIK GEOMETRI
Keywords:
interaksi sosial, kemampuan berpikir kreatif, optik geometriAbstract
Interaksi sosial dan keterampilan berpikir kreatif diamati untuk menguasai pemahaman konseptual siswa. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi aturan interaksi sosial dan keterampilan berpikir kreatif dalam memahami konsep siswa untuk pencapaian optik geometri optik. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif dengan jenis studi kasus. Berdasarkan hasil, dapat dilihat bahwa aturan interaksi sosial siswa dan keterampilan berpikir kreatif mempengaruhi prestasi fisika. Oleh karena itu, penting untuk memberdayakan keterampilan berpikir kreatif dalam belajar, terutama dalam mata pelajaran ilmu alam karena telah diberi nilai strategis. Penerapan model pembelajaran saintifik dengan metode eksperimen dan proyek ternyata menimbulkan perbedaan hasil belajar fisika. Pembelajaran ilmiah dengan metode lain juga dapat dilakukan untuk penelitian lebih lanjut. Belajar dengan hasil belajar dalam bidang pengetahuan, sikap, dan keterampilan dapat diperiksa polanya pada ulasan interaksi sosial dan keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa.
Â
Â
References
Adesoaji, F. A., & Omilani, N. A. (2012). A Comparation of Secondary Schools Students’ Levels of Conception of Qualitative and Quantitative Inorganic Analysisi. American Journal of Scientific and Insdustrial Research, 3(2), 56-61.
Dewi, Nastitisari. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kompleks Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan Mind Mapping. Jurnal Edu- Sains, 8(1).
Lewy, Zulkardi dan N. Aisyah. (2009). Pengembangan Soal untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Tingkat Tinggi Pokok Bahasan Barisan dan Deret Bilangan di Kelas IX Akselerasi SMP Xaverius Maria Palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (3), 12 (1), 15-28.
Kuhlthau, Carol. C. (2010). Guided Inquiry: School in the 21st Century. School Libraries Worldwide. 16, 17-28.
Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Teaching and learning 21st century skills: lessons from the learning sciences. RAND Corporation.
Lubis, M,. Muthmainnah., Nurdin., Chaeruman, U. A & Saeffudin. (2011). Kompetensi Guru. Jakarta : Teknologi Pendidikan UNJ.
Liu, O. L., Frankel, L., & Roohr, K. C. (2014). Assessing Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Current State and Directions for Next-Generation Assessment. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ, 6, 1-23.
Hedges, W. D. (1986). Testing and evaluation for science in the secondary school. Belmont: Wadswort Publishing Company, Inc.Kastberg,
D. (2016). Performance of U.S 15-year-old student in mathematics, science, and reading literacy in an internastional context: first look at PISA 2015 Washington: U.S Department of Education.
Pratiwi, Umi. (2015). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian HOTS Berbasis Kurikulum 2013 Terhadap Sikap Disiplin. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 1(1).
Ramirez, Rachel Patricia B., & Ganaden, Mildred S.. (2006). Creative Activities and Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills. Journal of Education Quarterly, December 2008, 66 (1), 22-23.
Pratiwi, Umi. (2015). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian HOTS Berbasis Kurikulum 2013 Terhadap Sikap Disiplin. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 1(1).
Treagust, David F. (1988). Development and Use of Diagnostic Tests to Evaluate Students’ Misconceptions in Science. International Journal of Science Education, 10 (2), 159-169.
Suwarto. (2013). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik dalam Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Mueller.J. (2005). The Authentic Assessment Toolbox: Enhancing Student Learning through Online Faculty Development [online]. North Central College, 1(1): 1-7.
Qing, Z., Ni, S., & Hong, T. (2010). Developing Critical Thinking Disposition by Task-Baed Learning in Chemistry Experiment Teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4561-4570.
OECD. 2014. PISA 2012 Results in Focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they candowithwhattheyknow.[Online].http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf. [25 Agustus 2019]
Roestiyah, N. K. (2001). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press
Pizzini, E. L. (1988). Rethinking Thinking in the Science Classroom. Washington DC: National Science Foundation.
Prasetyo. (2008). Pembelajaran Sains. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Educational Psychology Developing Learners. America: Merrice Prentice Hall.
Muhammad, S. (2015). Conceptual Framework of Authentic Chemistry Problem Solving Competency among School Students. Journal of Department of Educational Sciences, Mathematics and Multimedia Creative Faculty of Education Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 116 (22919), 122-129.
Marini. (2014). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Siswa dengan Gaya Belajar Tipe Investigatif dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Matematika dan Sains Universitas Jambi, 3 (5), 44-50.
Purwanto. 2013. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Qing, Z., Ni, S., & Hong, T. (2010). Developing Critical Thinking Disposition by Task-Baed Learning in Chemistry Experiment Teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4561-4570.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to Assess Higher Order Thinking Skillss in Your Class-room. Alexandria: ASCD.
Dewi, Nastitisari. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kompleks Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan Mind Mapping. Jurnal Edu- Sains, 8(1).
Heong, Y.M, et al. (2011). The level of Marzano higher order thinking skillss among technical education students. International Journal of Social Science and humanity. 1 (2):121-125.
Istiyono. E., Djemari Mardapi & Suparno. (2014). Pengembangan Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika (PhysTHOTS) Peserta Didik SMA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 14(1): 1-12.
Laily, Nur Rochmah. (2013). Analisis Soal Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Dalam Soal UN Kimia Sma Rayon B Tahun 2012/2013. Jurnal unswagati.9(1).
Gunawan, A. W. (2003). Genius Learning Strategy: Petunjuk Praktis untuk Menerapkan Accelerated Learning. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Kastberg, D. (2016). Performance of U.S 15-year-old student in mathematics, science, and reading literacy in an internastional context: first look at PISA 2015 Washington: U.S Department of Education.
Kelley, H. H. (1987). Attribution in social interaction. Amerika: Psycnet.
Joseph Berger, Bernard P. Cohen and Morris Zelditch, Jr. American Sociological Review, Vol. 37, No. 3 (Jun., 1972), pp. 241-255.
Caleon, I. dan Subramaniam, R. (2010). Development and Application of a Three-tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Secondary Students’ Understanding of Waves. International Journal of Science Education, 32:7, 939-961.
Chiu, S. & Chang, M. (2005). The Development of Authentic Assessments to Investigate Ninth Graders Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3: 117-140.
Conklin, W. (2012). Higher order thinking skills to develop 21st century learners. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education Publishing, Inc.
Heong, Y.M, et al. (2011). The level of Marzano higher order thinking skillss among technical education students. International Journal of Social Science and humanity. 1 (2):121-125.
Istiyono. E., Djemari Mardapi & Suparno. (2014). Pengembangan Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika (PhysTHOTS) Peserta Didik SMA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 14(1): 1-12.
Narayanan, S., & Adithan, M. (2015). Analysis Of Question Papers In Engineering Courses With Respect To Hots (Higher Order Thinking Skills).American Journal of Engineering Education (AJEE), 6(1):1-10.
