Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal psikologi mengundang manuskrip di bidang :

  1. Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi
  2. Psikologi Pendidikan
  3. Psikologi Perkembangan
  4. Psikologi Pendidikan
  5. Psikologi Kognitif

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office, whether it is suitable for Dinamika Psikologis: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologis focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similiarity score.

The manuscript will be sent to at least two reviewers (Single Blind Review). Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses.

The suggested decision will be evaluated in an editorial board meeting. Afterwards, the editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.

 

Publication Frequency

The behavioral Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi are published 2 times a year, namely:

Issue 1 Publish in May (review process in December - May)

Issue 2 Publish in November (June - November review process)

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Ethical Guideline

The publication of a peer-reviewed article in of Dinamika Psikologis: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologis is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society.

LPPM Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta as the publisher of Dinamika Psikologis: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologis takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, LPPM Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

 

Publication Decisions

The editor of the Dinamika Psikologis: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologis is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

 

Plagiarism Policy

Papers submitted to Dinamika Psikologis: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologis will be screened for plagiarism using CrossCheck/iThenticate plagiarism detection tools. Dinamika Psikologis: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologis will immediately reject papers leading to plagiarism or self-plagiarism.

Before submitting articles to reviewers, those are first checked for similarity/plagiarism tool, by a member of the editorial team. The papers submitted to Dinamika Psikologis: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologis must have similarity level less than 25%.

Plagiarism is the exposing of another person’s thoughts or words as though they were your own, without permission, credit, or acknowledgment, or because of failing to cite the sources properly. Plagiarism can take diverse forms, from literal copying to paraphrasing the work of another. In order to properly judge whether an author has plagiarized, we emphasize the following possible situations:

  • An author can literally copy another author’s work- by copying word by word, in whole or in part, without permission, acknowledge or citing the original source. This practice can be identified through comparing the original source and the manuscript/work who is suspected of plagiarism.
  • Substantial copying implies for an author to reproduce a substantial part of another author, without permission, acknowledge or citation. The substantial term can be understood both in terms of quality as quantity, being often used in the context of Intellectual property. Quality refers to the relative value of the copied text in proportion to the work as a whole.
  • Paraphrasing involves taking ideas, words or phrases from a source and crafting them into new sentences within the writing. This practice becomes unethical when the author does not properly cite or does not acknowledge the original work/author. This form of plagiarism is the more difficult form to be identified.