The impact of scientific and genre-based approach in english reading comprehension teaching

Lu'luil Maknun

Abstract


The purposes of this study are to determine the more effective approach between: (1) the scientific and conventional approaches, (2) the genre-based and conventional approaches, (3) the scientific and genre-based approaches, (4) the scientific, genre-based and conventional approaches in the teaching of reading comprehension of narrative texts. The research was quasi-experimental with randomized pretest-posttest control group design. The results of the study showed that the implementation of scientific and genre-based approach in reading comprehension teaching leads to better reading comprehension ability of the students. The result proved that students were able to understand the items posttest of narrative texts after 12 meeting of treatments using those approaches and also there were significant difference after conducting treatments. It could be proved from the testing criteria of one-way ANOVA that the null hypothesis (H0) was rejected and Ha was accepted if the value of p (probability) is lower than alpha 5% (0,05), the scientific approach is more effective than the conventional approach in the teaching of reading comprehension of narrative texts with the sig (p) ≤ 0.05, the genre-based approach is more effective than the conventional approach in the teaching of reading comprehension of narrative texts, with sig (p) ≤ 0.05, the scientific approach is more effective than the genre-based approach  in the teaching of reading comprehension of narrative texts, with sig (p) ≤ 0.05, and the scientific approach is the most effective of the three approaches under study. The findings revealed the great impact of scientific and genre-based approach, however probably is not significant if it is used in the other setting with the different background of the students.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahn, H. (2012). Teaching writing skills based on a genre approach to L2 primary school students. Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol.5, p.2.

Brookfield, D. S. (2012). Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and techniques to help Students question their assumptions. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Carey, S.S. (2011). A Beginner’s guide to scientific method, fourth edision. Boston: Wadsworth.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Third edition. California: Sage Publications

Feez, S. (2002). Text based syllabus design. New South Wales Sidney: Ames

Gunning, T. G. (2010). Reading comprehension boosters. 100 lesson for building higher-level literacy. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hyland, K. (2014). Second language writing. Australia: Cambridge Language Education.

Kemdikbud. (2013). Badan penelitian dan pengembangan tentang ujian nasional. Diambil pada tanggal 12 Mei 2014, dari http: //litbang.kemdikbud.go.id.

Kemendiknas. (2013b). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 65 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Proses untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendiknas.

___________. (2013b). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 65 tahun 2013 tentang Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendiknas.

___________. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 41 tahun 2007 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendiknas.

Khatibi, B. (2014). The effect of genre-based teaching on EFL learners’ speaking performance. International Journal of Research in ELT (IJRELT), Educational Research Association, Turkey, vol. 2, No. 1

Linse, C. T. (2006). Practical English language teaching: Young learners. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Nation, ISP. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. New York: Routledge

Nugraha, I.S & Suherdi, D. (2017). Scientific approach: An English learning-teaching (ELT) approach in the 2013 curriculum. Journal of English and Education, UPI, vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 112-119

Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. New York. McGraw-Hill.

Richards, J.C, & Renandya W.A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge: University Press.

Schirmer, B. R. (2010). Teaching the struggling reader. Boston: Pearson Education.

Subali, B. & Suyata, P. (2012). Pengembangan item tes konvergen dan divergen dan penenyelidikan validitasnya secara empiris. Yogyakarta: Diandra Pustaka Indonesia.

Sugirin. (2013). Hakikat reading dam implikasinya bagi pembelajaran. Rapat terbuka senat, tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta.

Tim Dosen Filsafat Ilmu Fakultas Filsafat UGM. (2007). Filsafat ilmu sebagai dasar pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Zuchdi, D. (2008). Strategi meningkatkan kemampuan membaca. Yogyakarta:UNY Press.

Advertising Texts. Proceeding of 7th International Conference on Education, Management, Information and Mechanical Engineering (EMIM 2017). Advances in Computer Science Research (ACSR), volume 76.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26486/jele.v5i1.834

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 12 times
PDF - 11 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright of  JELE (Journal of English Language and Education), ISSN 2541-6421 (online)ISSN 2460-7142 (print) Gedung LPPM Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta

Kampus I  : Jl. Wates Km. 10 Yogyakarta 55753. Telp: 0274-6498212, 6498211, Fax. 0274-6498213 

Email: [email protected]

 

tumblr counter
Jele View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.